Identifying relevant concepts in a large corpus of medical images
Interpreting and summarizing the insights gained from medical images such as radiology output is a time-consuming task that involves highly trained experts and often represents a bottleneck in clinical diagnosis pipelines.
Consequently, there is a considerable need for automatic methods that can approximate this mapping from visual information to condensed textual descriptions. The more image characteristics are known, the more structured are the radiology scans and hence, the more efficient are the radiologists regarding interpretation. We work on the basis of a large-scale collection of figures from open access biomedical journal articles (PubMed Central). All images in the training data are accompanied by UMLS concepts extracted from the original image caption.
In the first and second editions of this task, held at ImageCLEF 2017 and ImageCLEF 2018, participants noted a broad variety of content and situation among training images. For this year, the training data is reduced solely to radiology images
A large number of concepts was used in the previous years. This year, the captions are first processed before concept extraction, hence leading to a reduced number of concepts
As uncertainty regarding additional source was noted, we will clearly separate systems using exclusively the official training data from those that incorporate additional sources of evidence
The first step to automatic image captioning and scene understanding is identifying the presence and location of relevant concepts in a large corpus of medical images. Based on the visual image content, this subtask provides the building blocks for the scene understanding step by identifying the individual components from which captions are composed. The concepts can be further applied for context-based image and information retrieval purposes.
Evaluation is conducted in terms of set coverage metrics such as precision, recall, and combinations thereof. This task will be run using a subset of the Radiology Objects in COntext ( ROCO ) dataset .
From the PubMed Open Access subset containing 1,828,575 archives, a total number of 6,031,814 image - caption pairs were extracted. To focus on radiology images and non-compound figures, automatic filtering with deep learning systems as well as manual revisions were applied, reducing the dataset to 72,187 radiology images of several medical imaging modalities.
NOTE: If the usage of an additional source for training is intended, it should not be a subset of PubMed Central Open Access (archiving date: 01.02.2018 - 01.02.2019), to avoid an overlap with the test data.
As soon as the submission is open, you will find a “Create Submission” button on this page (just next to the tabs)
For the submission we expect the following format:
- Figure-ID TAB Concept-ID-1;Concept-ID-2;Concept-ID-n e.g.:
- ROCO_07563 C0043299;C1306645;C1548003;C1962945
You need to respect the following constraints:
- The separator between the figure ID and the concepts has to be a tabular whitespace
- The separator between the UMLS concepts has to be a semicolon (;)
- Each figure ID of the test set must be included in the submitted file exactly once (even if there are not concepts)
- The same concept cannot be specified more than once for a given figure ID
 O. Pelka, S. Koitka, J. Rückert, F. Nensa und C. M. Friedrich „Radiology Objects in COntext (ROCO): A Multimodal Image Dataset“, Proceedings of the MICCAI Workshop on Large-scale Annotation of Biomedical data and Expert Label Synthesis (MICCAI LABELS 2018), Granada, Spain, September 16, 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) Volume 11043, Page 180-189, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01364-6_20, Springer Verlag, 2018.
Evaluation is conducted in terms of F1 scores between system predicted and ground truth concepts, using the following methodology and parameters:
The default implementation of the Python scikit-learn (v0.17.1-2) F1 scoring method is used. It is documented here.
A Python (3.x) script loads the candidate run file, as well as the ground truth (GT) file, and processes each candidate-GT concept sets
For each candidate-GT concept set, the y_pred and y_true arrays are generated. They are binary arrays indicating for each concept contained in both candidate and GT set if it is present (1) or not (0).
The F1 score is then calculated. The default ‘binary’ averaging method is used.
All F1 scores are summed and averaged over the number of elements in the test set (10’000), giving the final score.
The ground truth for the test set was generated based on the UMLS Full Release 2018AB .
NOTE : The source code of the evaluation tool is available here. It must be executed using Python 3.x, on a system where the scikit-learn (>= v0.17.1-2) Python library is installed. The script should be run like this:
/path/to/python3 evaluate-f1.py /path/to/candidate/file /path/to/ground-truth/file
The leaderboard will be visible from 01.05.2019 (official deadline) on. The submission system will remain open a few more days. Results submitted after the deadline will not be part of the official results.
Note: In order to participate in this challenge you have to sign an End User Agreement (EUA). You will find more information on the ‘Dataset’ tab. ImageCLEF lab is part of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum: CLEF 2019. CLEF 2019 consists of independent peer-reviewed workshops on a broad range of challenges in the fields of multilingual and multimodal information access evaluation, and a set of benchmarking activities carried in various labs designed to test different aspects of mono and cross-language Information retrieval systems. More details about the conference can be found here .
Submitting a working note with the full description of the methods used in each run is mandatory. Any run that could not be reproduced thanks to its description in the working notes might be removed from the official publication of the results. Working notes are published within CEUR-WS proceedings, resulting in an assignment of an individual DOI (URN) and an indexing by many bibliography systems including DBLP. According to the CEUR-WS policies, a light review of the working notes will be conducted by the ImageCLEF organizing committee to ensure quality. As an illustration, ImageCLEF 2018 working notes (task overviews and participant working notes) can be found within CLEF 2018 CEUR-WS proceedings.
Participants of this challenge will automatically be registered at CLEF 2019. In order to be compliant with the CLEF registration requirements, please edit your profile by providing the following additional information:
Regarding the username, please choose a name that represents your team.
This information will not be publicly visible and will be exclusively used to contact you and to send the registration data to CLEF, which is the main organizer of all CLEF labs
Participating as an individual (non affiliated) researcher
We welcome individual researchers, i.e. not affiliated to any institution, to participate. We kindly ask you to provide us with a motivation letter containing the following information:
the presentation of your most relevant research activities related to the task/tasks
your motivation for participating in the task/tasks and how you want to exploit the results
a list of the most relevant 5 publications (if applicable)
the link to your personal webpage
The motivation letter should be directly concatenated to the End User Agreement document or sent as a PDF file to bionescu at imag dot pub dot ro. The request will be analyzed by the ImageCLEF organizing committee. We reserve the right to refuse any applicants whose experience in the field is too narrow, and would therefore most likely prevent them from being able to finish the task/tasks.
ImageCLEF 2019 is an evaluation campaign that is being organized as part of the CLEF initiative labs. The campaign offers several research tasks that welcome participation from teams around the world. The results of the campaign appear in the working notes proceedings, published by CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org). Selected contributions among the participants, will be invited for publication in the following year in the Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) together with the annual lab overviews.
- Technical issues : https://gitter.im/crowdAI/imageclef-2019-caption-concept-detection
- Discussion Forum : https://www.crowdai.org/challenges/imageclef-2019-caption-concept-detection/topics
We strongly encourage you to use the public channels mentioned above for communications between the participants and the organizers. In extreme cases, if there are any queries or comments that you would like to make using a private communication channel, then you can send us an email at :
- Obioma Pelka: obioma[DOT]pelka[AT]fh-dortmund[DOT]de
- Christoph M. Friedrich: christoph[DOT]friedrich[AT]fh-dortmund[DOT]de
- Alba Garcia Seco de Herrera: alba[DOT]garcia[AT]essex[DOT]ac[DOT]uk
- Henning Müller: henning[DOT]mueller[AT]hevs[DOT]ch
You can find additional information on the challenge here: http://imageclef.org/2019/caption